Add solution for Challenge 30 by kiramux #726
Conversation
WalkthroughAdds a Go context management utility: a Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant CM as ContextManager\n(simpleContextManager)
participant Ctx as context.Context
participant Task as Task Goroutine
Client->>CM: NewContextManager()
CM-->>Client: manager instance
Client->>CM: CreateCancellableContext(parent)
CM->>Ctx: context.WithCancel(parent)
Ctx-->>CM: ctx, cancel
CM-->>Client: ctx, cancel
Client->>CM: AddValue(ctx, key, value)
CM->>Ctx: context.WithValue(ctx, key, value)
Ctx-->>Client: derived ctx
Client->>CM: ExecuteWithContext(ctx, task)
CM->>Task: spawn goroutine to run task()
alt task completes before ctx.Done
Task-->>CM: task result / nil
else ctx cancelled / timed out
Ctx-->>Task: ctx.Done
Task-->>CM: propagate ctx error
end
CM-->>Client: error or nil
Client->>CM: WaitForCompletion(ctx, duration)
CM->>CM: select on ctx.Done or timeout
CM-->>Client: nil or timeout error
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Pre-merge checks✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
challenge-30/submissions/kiramux/solution-template.go (2)
62-73: Consider simplifying the value check.The if-else block can be condensed for cleaner code.
Apply this diff:
func (cm *simpleContextManager) GetValue(ctx context.Context, key interface{}) (interface{}, bool) { - // DONE: Implement value retrieval from context - // Hint: Use ctx.Value(key) and check if it's nil value := ctx.Value(key) - // Return the value and a boolean indicating if it was found - if value != nil { - return value, true - } else { - return nil, false - } + return value, value != nil }
76-92: Consider task cancellation behavior.The implementation correctly uses a buffered channel to prevent goroutine blocking. However, if the context is cancelled, the task goroutine continues running in the background. This is acceptable for short-lived tasks but may be worth documenting. For production code, consider whether tasks should internally respect context cancellation.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
challenge-30/submissions/kiramux/solution-template.go(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
challenge-30/submissions/kiramux/solution-template.go (9)
1-7: LGTM!Package declaration and imports are appropriate for a context management utility.
9-28: LGTM!The interface is well-designed with clear method signatures and documentation.
30-36: LGTM!Good use of unexported implementation with exported interface. The stateless design is appropriate for this utility.
38-52: LGTM!Both context creation methods correctly use the standard library functions.
54-60: LGTM!Correct implementation of context value attachment.
94-105: LGTM!Correct implementation of context-aware waiting.
107-119: LGTM!Clean implementation of cancellable work simulation.
121-140: Verify the necessity of the sleep in ProcessItems.The comment on line 132 suggests the
time.Sleep(30 * time.Millisecond)was added specifically to work around test timing issues rather than for legitimate processing simulation. This is a code smell—production code should not be tailored to test implementation details.If this sleep is intended to simulate processing time for demonstration purposes, that should be clarified. If it's truly a workaround for test timing, consider whether the test expectations or the implementation approach need adjustment.
142-160: LGTM!The example usage clearly demonstrates the context manager functionality.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
challenge-30/submissions/kiramux/solution-template.go (2)
62-73: Simplify the conditional logic.The else clause is unnecessary and can be simplified for better readability.
Apply this diff:
func (cm *simpleContextManager) GetValue(ctx context.Context, key interface{}) (interface{}, bool) { // DONE: Implement value retrieval from context // Hint: Use ctx.Value(key) and check if it's nil value := ctx.Value(key) - // Return the value and a boolean indicating if it was found - if value != nil { - return value, true - } else { - return nil, false - } + return value, value != nil }Note: This implementation cannot distinguish between a stored
nilvalue and a missing key, which is a known limitation of Go'scontext.ValueAPI.
76-92: Consider passing context to the task function.The task function signature
func() errordoesn't allow the task itself to respond to cancellation. WhileExecuteWithContextwill returnctx.Err()if the context is cancelled, the task continues running in the background until completion.Consider changing the signature to:
-func (cm *simpleContextManager) ExecuteWithContext(ctx context.Context, task func() error) error { +func (cm *simpleContextManager) ExecuteWithContext(ctx context.Context, task func(context.Context) error) error { // DONE: Implement task execution with context cancellation // Hint: Run the task in a goroutine and use select with ctx.Done() done := make(chan error, 1) go func() { - done <- task() + done <- task(ctx) }()This allows tasks to proactively check for cancellation and clean up resources appropriately.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
challenge-30/submissions/kiramux/solution-template.go(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
challenge-30/submissions/kiramux/solution-template.go (4)
9-28: LGTM! Clear interface design.The interface is well-documented and follows standard Go context patterns.
30-36: LGTM! Good use of interface return type.The stateless implementation and interface return type follow Go best practices.
107-119: LGTM! Proper cancellation handling.The function correctly respects context cancellation and uses select appropriately.
142-160: LGTM! Clear example usage.The main function provides a good demonstration of the basic context manager functionality.
| // Helper function - process multiple items with context | ||
| func ProcessItems(ctx context.Context, items []string) ([]string, error) { | ||
| // DONE: Implement batch processing with context awareness | ||
| // Process each item but check for cancellation between items | ||
| // Return partial results if cancelled | ||
| result := make([]string, 0, len(items)) | ||
| for _, s := range items { | ||
| select { | ||
| case <-ctx.Done(): | ||
| return result, ctx.Err() | ||
| default: | ||
| // The test file's cancellation wait time is too short; a wait time needs to be set. | ||
| time.Sleep(30 * time.Millisecond) | ||
| processedStr := "processed_" + s | ||
| result = append(result, processedStr) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return result, nil | ||
|
|
||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove test-specific workaround.
The comment on line 132 and the hardcoded 30ms sleep on line 133 indicate this code is tailored to pass specific tests rather than being a proper implementation. This makes the code brittle and not representative of production usage.
The ProcessItems function should simulate realistic work without hardcoded timing workarounds. Consider either:
- Remove the sleep entirely if items process instantly:
for _, s := range items {
select {
case <-ctx.Done():
return result, ctx.Err()
default:
- // The test file's cancellation wait time is too short; a wait time needs to be set.
- time.Sleep(30 * time.Millisecond)
processedStr := "processed_" + s
result = append(result, processedStr)
}
}- Make processing time configurable if work simulation is needed:
func ProcessItems(ctx context.Context, items []string, processTime time.Duration) ([]string, error) {
result := make([]string, 0, len(items))
for _, s := range items {
select {
case <-ctx.Done():
return result, ctx.Err()
case <-time.After(processTime):
result = append(result, "processed_"+s)
}
}
return result, nil
}If tests require specific timing, they should use techniques like dependency injection or time mocking rather than hardcoding values in production code.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In challenge-30/submissions/kiramux/solution-template.go around lines 121 to
140, remove the test-specific 30ms sleep and either eliminate simulated delay
entirely or make the processing delay configurable via a parameter (e.g., add a
processTime time.Duration argument) so callers/tests can control timing; update
the loop to respect ctx.Done() and either append results immediately or wait on
time.After(processTime) (instead of a hardcoded sleep) and update any
callers/tests to pass the desired duration or mock time as needed.
1 participant
Challenge 30 Solution
Submitted by: @kiramux
Challenge: Challenge 30
Description
This PR contains my solution for Challenge 30.
Changes
challenge-30/submissions/kiramux/solution-template.goTesting
Thank you for reviewing my submission! 🚀