While looking through the repository I found a few inconsistencies regarding the LICENSE of the crate...

What I found:

1. The README states:

“Unless you explicitly state otherwise, any contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the work by you, as defined in the Apache-2.0 license, shall be dual licensed as above…”

However:

• There is no LICENSE or LICENSES/ directory in the repository root.

• The crates in this workspace do not share a single license — some are ISC, some are MIT OR Apache-2.0.

• Here is the output of a license scan across all Cargo.toml files:

grep -R --include="Cargo.toml" -n 'license\s*=' .

./riscv-pac/Cargo.toml:12:license = "ISC"
./riscv-peripheral/Cargo.toml:12:license = "ISC"
./riscv-rt/Cargo.toml:11:license = "ISC"
./riscv-rt/macros/Cargo.toml:10:license = "MIT OR Apache-2.0"
./riscv-semihosting/Cargo.toml:11:license = "MIT OR Apache-2.0"
./riscv-target-parser/Cargo.toml:11:license = "ISC"
./riscv/Cargo.toml:12:license = "ISC"

Why this is a problem:

• The README suggests Apache-2.0 dual licensing, but most crates are actually ISC.

• Two crates do use MIT OR Apache-2.0, so the repo is mixed-licensed.

Suggested fix:

• We can include a LICENSE.md and state in the README clearly with what LICENSE the repo uses.

Thank you